Postcards From a
Prison Pandemic
Moon Shot: Part 5
The Wall
by a
“Cloistered Brother”
Early in the 1990s, the Massachusetts Department of
Correction faced a dilemma at MCI-Norfolk.
The concrete wall built in the 1930s that surrounded the prison was crumbling. Cracks ran through portions of the imposing
perimeter. Bits of concrete that had
fallen to the ground were collected regularly by correctional officers as they
walked the green space between the inner perimeter fence and wall, a space
called the “Dead Man Zone.”
The DOC was presented with two fixes. The wall could be rebuilt or a high-grade
security fence could be installed, in place of the wall. Rebuilding the wall was the more expensive of
the two options and tall concrete security walls had gone out of vogue in
prison construction by the 1990s. In
fact, when the DOC converted Bay State Correctional Center, next door to
Norfolk, into a medium-security prison a few years earlier, they had chosen to
use the fencing.
Yet, when the time came for the DOC to make a choice, the
department chose the outdated and overpriced option. The DOC rebuilt Norfolk’s wall. Why? Because no one in authority could
imagine Norfolk without a wall.
One thing I have learned during my nearly fifteen years of
incarceration is that the primary driver in how individual prisons function is
not a mission statement, governing philosophy, or five years strategic
plan. What really determines how a
prison operates is architecture.
In this edition of Postcards From a Prison Pandemic’s “Moon
Shot” series, we look at prison architecture and how many prison facilities can
no longer be used in a COVID-19 world.
From office parks to college campuses, a critical
examination is going on to the deter COVID-19 world.
While today’s news contains reports of possible vaccines and potential
treatments to try to stave off the coronavirus, medical experts will tell you
that there is far more that we do not know about this virus than we do know.
We do not know how long it will take for us to fully mitigate
COVID-19. We do not know what the next
wave will be like. We do not know if antibodies provide those who have had the
virus with any level of extended protection. We do not know if this virus will
easily morph into multiple strains that will require us to develop multiple
vaccines. We want the coronavirus and
COVID-19 to go away, but we do not know if it ever will.
What we do know is that public spaces built to reinforce the
tight congregation of people are currently obsolete. This means that every
prison in Massachusetts, perhaps every prison in America, is obsolete. I know how difficult this idea will be for
many to grasp. But the facts are the facts.
Since 1877, when what is today MCI-Framingham was built,
prisons in Massachusetts have been built to house people in close
quarters. Over the past 143 years, as
more prisons came online in the state, more people found themselves trapped
inside.
Through the years, Massachusetts has gone through periods of
prison building and renovations. The
first was in the 1870s, followed by one in 1930, another in the early 1970s, and
one in the late 1980s. The state last
built a prison in 1998 but has continued to remodel and repurpose facilities
over the past twenty-two years. Almost
every building project had at its core, one purpose: Incarcerate more people
more efficiently.
Today, MCI-Norfolk holds 1300 people. Many of the lifers who have been here for
more than thirty years can remember a time when the prison held 800 or
fewer. So, how do you pack an additional
500 people into a prison? You pack them
in tighter. Two-man cells, four-man cells, six-man cells, and large dormitories
are now a central part of the DOC’s housing plan. Women and men are shoehorned into living
spaces that were never built to accommodate current populations.
Since the outbreak of COVID-19, which is spreading through
most state prisons, what has been the DOC’s solution to this congregational
health crisis? The prisons went into
lockdown and the DOC issued a memo instructing people housed in multiple bunk
cells and dorms simply to sleep head-to-foot.
Okay, but what is a person supposed to do during a month-long (so far)
lockdown? Are the people supposed to
spend weeks on end lying in bed head-to-foot until the present crisis passes?
As soon as one person in such a cell stands or even sits up in bed, social
distancing is over. When I note this
problem to a staff member two weeks ago, the response I got was, “It is what it
is.”
Earlier in this series, I wrote about the challenges of delivering
education and programming in a COVID-19 world.
I talked about how the buildings where prisoners go to school and attend
rehabilitative programs are far too small to continue to serve the prison
population. When you look at these areas
and prisoner living spaces, it is clear that there is almost nowhere inside a prison where a person can go to be safe from COVID-19.
In 2018, the state legislature passed an omnibus crime bill
to begin the process of overhauling the state’s criminal punishment system. During the reform push, Governor Charlie
Baker negotiated and received the ability to issue $ 560 million in bonds to
build and remodel prisons in the Commonwealth.
The governor was quietly on his way to using the first $ 50 million of
that money to build a new women’s prison until Lois Ahrens and The Real Cost of
Prisons Project shined a spotlight on the process. In late February, the DOC informed me in a
letter that the new prison had been put on hold and would be re-evaluated.
In a COVID-19 world, the DOC is now also forced to
re-evaluate all the state’s current prisons.
Let me be clear, the answer is not to build new prisons that allow for
social distancing. As I wrote earlier in
this series, there are many people incarcerated who should not be locked
up. Like Lois Ahrens and all those who
support The Real Cost of Prisons Project, we must stand guard to prevent the
DOC from using the coronavirus to expand its physical footprint, rather than
reducing its unnecessarily high prison population.
A better solution to the DOC’s housing crisis is to look to
Europe where in many locations, authorities house those sentenced in far
different ways than America. Countries
like Germany and Norway have created facilities that look like modern apartment
complexes, not gulags. In these
complexes, sentenced people live in a community of other sentenced people, but
they often work, study, and attend programs in the larger public community.
What is odd is that some of the progressive thinking that
led to this form of corrections was nurtured in America—in Massachusetts—in
Norfolk. The prison where I am housed
was built in the early 1930s as a social experiment. The Norfolk Prison Colony was conceived and
run in its early days by Harvard Professor Howard Gill. Professor Gill invented a space that was
meant not only to reflect the world outside but also to interact with it
daily. Instead of cells, Colony
residents lived inside rooms. Instead of
multi-tiered housing units full of bars
and concrete, Norfolk’s residents lived inside three-story houses that looked
like English row homes. There were no
housing officers. Instead, each house
had a House Manager—a civilian employee who not only managed the house but
slept there each night as well. Norfolk
changed as more fences and gates were installed. Today, it functions in most ways like any
other medium-security prison in the state.
During that same time, America abandoned the idea of communities like
Norfolk Colony and began building concrete boxes filled with cages.
In a COVID-19 world, prisons can no longer function as
presently built. The question remains as to which government officials will be
the first to have the imagination to embrace this reality. The physical transition of America’s prison
infrastructure will be one of the many big challenges faced by state governments
moving forward.
The DOC is responsible for my care and custody. But in a COVID-19 world, my custody is now
detrimental to my care. Like Norfolk’s
wall in the early 1990s, the entire infrastructure of prisons is crumbling due
to the coronavirus. I hope that
officials will this time choose not the unacceptable architecture of the past,
but will instead choose to imagine something new.
No comments:
Post a Comment