Intruding into my semi-conscious internet surfing are some discussions on weather and newscasters' appearance. Here's one sample here. Some of the comments resonated what I've been thinking for years. But I've never blamed the performer herself. I blame her costumer, or whoever plans her wardrobe.
When the credits roll, I see who did the hair, makeup, and clothes for the newscaster/weather person. I blame whoever chooses the "clothes." If the store who provides the clothes aims to get customers from the show, they've lost me. Most people buy clothes for work. The people on television need to reflect that. If they did, 99% of the time, the women would be wearing pants and tops. Usually, the women wear dresses that you'd wear to a wedding reception. And I get that sleeveless is "sexy," but it would be more sensible to have a cardigan or jacket paired with the dress. In fact, taking the sweater off or putting it on would advertise the clothing.
I'm just criticizing the sensibleness of the wardrobe. I just want the ladies to wear what I would mostly buy--career type clothes, not the occasional dresses to go clubbing or a wedding reception.
When the credits roll, I see who did the hair, makeup, and clothes for the newscaster/weather person. I blame whoever chooses the "clothes." If the store who provides the clothes aims to get customers from the show, they've lost me. Most people buy clothes for work. The people on television need to reflect that. If they did, 99% of the time, the women would be wearing pants and tops. Usually, the women wear dresses that you'd wear to a wedding reception. And I get that sleeveless is "sexy," but it would be more sensible to have a cardigan or jacket paired with the dress. In fact, taking the sweater off or putting it on would advertise the clothing.
I'm just criticizing the sensibleness of the wardrobe. I just want the ladies to wear what I would mostly buy--career type clothes, not the occasional dresses to go clubbing or a wedding reception.
No comments:
Post a Comment